PDA

View Full Version : Had trouble believing this!


Neil
02-06-2009, 05:31 PM
That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government

Sounds like the ramblings of an anti Government zealot, but it's from a bill being introduced in New Hampshire.

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html

Daisy
02-07-2009, 07:56 AM
Wow, I had to read and re read this bill to make sure I was understanding it right, because they don't use language that I can easily understand. Am I right that what this says is - when the government passes laws that are against the constitution of this country, they will be considered void and do not have to be obeyed by the state of New Hampshire?

That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force;


Once again, I say..........Wow...........and (if I'm understanding it) it's about time!

Neil
02-07-2009, 08:38 AM
It looks that way doesn't it?

Neil
02-07-2009, 08:52 AM
Seems like it's catching on:

7 States Join New Hampshire
EIGHT STATES NOW DECLARE SOVEREIGNTY! Several states have recently appealed to the 10th and/or the 9th Amendments to assert their state rights over federal government. These amendments state:

Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment 10 - Powers of the States and People. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Below is a list of the 8 states and a link to their legislation.

Washington

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2009&bill=4009


New Hampshire

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html


Arizona

http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm


Montana

http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm


Michigan

http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(sjgu5xbql1n5xf45imuuysrm))/documents/2009-2010/Journal/House/htm/2009-HJ-01-22-002.htm


Missouri

http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM


Oklahoma

http://axiomamuse.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/state-legislator-charles-key-wants-to-limit-federal-power/


Hawaii

http://www.hawaii-nation.org/

Daisy
02-07-2009, 11:47 AM
These bills failed in some states last year, but are being reintroduced this year. I think more states are expected to introduce the state sovereignty bill - an estimated 20 altogether, according to a bunch of info I read. They are trying to get the federal government out of the state's business.

Sen. Randy Brogdon of Oklahoma stated,

"This particular 111th Congress is the biggest bunch of over-reachers and underachievers we've ever had in Congress," he said.

"A sixth-grader should realize you can't borrow money to pay off your debt, and that is the Obama administration's answer for a stimulus package," he added.


Maybe.....hopefully......people are starting to wake up and say, "We've had ENOUGH!" :torch: